Lien vers le site web officiel. This website is not an official website of the CNRS. It is maintained by the members of the national committee of the section 02 mandate Its purpose is to disseminate information to the theoretical physics community. Link to the official website.
This note outlines the evaluation criteria that will be used by Section 02 of the CoNRS, whether it sits as an evaluation and promotion body or as an eligibility jury for recruitment competitions. These criteria cannot, however, fully account for the diversity of existing situations, which plays an important role in the evaluation process. The variety of profiles and environments from which the candidates benefit will also be taken into account during the evaluation.
The evaluation is based first and foremost on the scientific contributions made by the participants. It then integrates the other dimensions of the research activity: dissemination of knowledge, valorization and transfer, leadership and management responsibilities, etc.
Arguments concerning thematic balance may also be taken into consideration. The new format of the application for promotion proposes, for example, to highlight 10 scientific productions rather than an exhaustive list. In any case, the primary criterion is the quality of the scientific contributions.
In the case of a promotion, priority will be given to contributions since the last promotion. The section will consider the recruitment of research fellows from the first years after the thesis and possibly more important courses. The scientific quality of the candidates is in all circumstances the first criterion of evaluation.
Nous recommandons aux candidats de les lire attentivement. Les dates pour les auditions sont indicatives. Un dossier de candidature incluant tous les documents obligatoires mais sans lettres de recommandation sera pris en compte. The only trustworthy information on the « Concours Chercheurs » is that available on the official site of the CNRS competition. Number of positions for the « Concours Chercheurs »: 6 positions of research fellow normal class CRCN and 5 positions of research director 2nd class DR2.
The complete list of open positions within section 02 — as well as within all other sections — is available on the official website of the CNRS competition. The dates for the interviews are indicative. We invite the candidate to refer to the dates indicated in the official notification to attend. The results will only be published on the official website of the CNRS and the section will not communicate through other channels before this publication.
In the case of email submission, and in order to avoid that letters be lost, please make sure to use the following format:. Please limit the number of letters to three. In addition, a support letter from the lab s not mandatory can be sent via the same procedure.
Ces lettres sont une coutume. Bien des candidat. Merci pour votre aide. Bonjour mme Lermercier, Merci pour votre dossier concernant le projet de recherche. Bonjour et merci. Justement, je ne suis pas en post doc. Merci beaucoup! On laisse tomber?? S les candidat. Bon courage, CL. S les membres des sections. Je sais, je ne devrais pas crier. Donc… quoi penser? Sur le premier point, relisez le billet et regardez les projets en annexe. Ensuite, mieux vaut ne pas indiquer un poste qui se prolonge.
Sur quoi se base la commission? Comment cela est-il possible? Par exemple, je candidate en Vous indiquez C. Ping : Histoire des mondes du travail — Recrutement de chercheurs. Pensez aux CID…. Au final, commencer par un CR2, et garder un CR1 pour la commission suivante. Ping : Faire un postdoc Redoc Paris-Est. Merci pour ce post! Ping : Etre candidat. Bonsoir, Merci pour vos conseils. Attention, je ne parle pas ici du dossier de qualification au CNU.
Site web.
0コメント